Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R. N. Singh, Judicial Member, Rajinder Kashyap, Administrative Member
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of termination during training (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 12 , 17 , 18) |
| 2. precedents on stigmatic termination require inquiry (Para 6 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondents defend termination as simpliciter (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. termination punitive without natural justice inquiry (Para 11 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. reinstate with liberty for disciplinary proceedings (Para 21) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-
In the present OA, the applicant has challenged the order dated 02.07.2015 (Annexure A-2) vide which he has been terminated from services of the respondents and a memorandum dated 10.12.2015 (Annexure A-3) vide which the impugned termination order has been upheld. The applicant has prayed for the following reliefs in Para 8 of the above OA: -
“(i) To quash and set aside the order dated 12.06.2015 and order dated 02.07.2015 whereby the services of applicant to the post of LDC has been terminated, order dated 10.12.2015 whereby the appeal of the applicant has been rejected and to further direct the respondent that applicant be reinstate back in service to the post of LDC forthwith with all consequential benefits including seniority and promotion and pay
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
