Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J, Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, A
N. Thirugnanam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. oa challenges removal from service order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. inquiry violated natural justice principles. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. applicant admitted fraud; review powers valid. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. precedents support dismissal for misappropriation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. removal appropriate for fiduciary misappropriation. (Para 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. charges detailed; unconditional admission proven. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. oa dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 22) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:
“(i) To call for the records of the 2nd respondent made Memo No.STC/17-1/2012/TRY/TR, dated 12.06.2014, and the order of removal from service of the Applicant made in Memo No.STC/18-2/2014, st dated 08.09.2014, and the order of the 1 Respondent made in Memo No.STC/2-4/2014, dated 24.12.2014, and set aside the same, consequent to;
(ii)Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all service benefits and;
(iii To pass such further or other order as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
