CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member, Sangam Narain Srivastava, Administrative Member
M. Sahadevan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pre-1994 retiree's pension fixation history (Para 2) |
| 2. parties cite precedent judgments (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. precedent mandates higher pension fixation (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. direct pension refixation and benefits ordered (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Member(J))
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following relief:
“... to call for all the records relating to refusal to properly re-fix the Basic Pension of the Applicant consequent to im- plementation of the recommendations of the VI – CPC, the impugned order No. M/P.353/CC/OA 233/2017 dated 25.04.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same, consequently :-
i. To direct the respondents to re-fix the basic pension of the applicant at Rs. 6750 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 i.e., on imple- mentation of the recommendations of VI –CPC;
ii. to direct the respondents to sanction other consequential benefits; and
iii. to pass such other order/orders”
2. Brief facts of the case as submitted by the applicant:
The Applicant retired from service on 30.06.1994 as Station Master Gr.III (SM Gr.III) in the Scale of Pay of Rs.1400-2300 and his pension was fixed accordingly. On implementation of V-CPC the pay for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.