Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Krishna, Administrative Member, Umesh Gajankush, Judicial Member
Ashok S/o Mansaram Masram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's retirement and claim for notional increment. (Para 1) |
| 2. representations made and respondents' pending clarification response. (Para 2) |
| 3. supreme court entitles retirees to earned increment despite next-day retirement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. direct notional increment from july 2023; oa disposed. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (Administrative)
The applicant has retired on superannuation on 30th June, 2017. He has filed this OA seeking direction to the respondents to grant notional increment from 01st July, 2017 on the basis of judgment of Hon’ble The Director (Admn. Supreme Court in the case of And HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 401. He submits that he has made representation to the respondents on the last day of his retirement i.e. on 30.06.207 to grant him notional increment from 01st July, 2017. However, the copy of the same has not been placed on record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant does not have any evidence of submitting the representation dated 30th June, 2017 and he has made this submission on the basis of applicant’s oral submission. Subsequently, he has made representat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
