Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Indirawati Devi – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Secretary cum DG, Department of Posts – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the applicant's husband's employment status and benefits (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding entitlement to pension (Para 12 , 13) |
| 3. relevant statutory framework and rules regarding temporary employees (Para 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 24) |
| 4. recognition of rights accrued to long-serving temporary employees (Para 35 , 42 , 46) |
| 5. final decision on granting pension and related benefits to the applicant (Para 61 , 62 , 65) |
ORDER
PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. Heard learned counsel for parties with consent through video conferencing mode.
PRAYER
2. By way of present Original Application filed under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act 1985, applicant has sought the main relief (as extracted from OA) as under:-
“A. Letter No.1124(B-15/CAT/92/2017/Indrawati Devi) Dated at Samastipur the 11.11.2019, containing undated Speaking Order issued by Superintendent RMS ‘NB’ Division, Samastipur as contained in Annexure A/1, whereby the claim applicant of applicant for her family pension, death benefit and retiral benefits has erroneously been rejected, may be quashed and set aside.
B. The respondent authorities may be dire
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
