SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13678

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Ravi Kant Dube – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No.996 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Ashish Srivastava
For the Respondents: Shri Rishi Kumar

Autonomous bodies adopting Central NPS must apply OM dated 03.03.2023, granting old pension option to employees from pre-22.12.2003 advertisements despite post-01.01.2004 joining.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 - National Pension System - Office Memorandum dated 03.03.2023 by Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare - Employee joined service on 21.02.2005 against advertisement issued in 2003 prior to NPS notification on 22.12.2003 - Autonomous body adopted NPS w.e.f. 01.01.2004 - Held, OM dated 03.03.2023 applicable to autonomous bodies adopting Central Government NPS scheme; employees recruited against pre-22.12.2003 advertisements entitled to one-time option for old pension scheme despite joining post-01.01.2004 - Condition in appointment letter accepting NPS not binding if recruitment process commenced under old scheme - Directions issued to extend old pension benefits and transfer NPS deductions to GPF. (Paras 10, 12, 14, 15)

(B) Pension Schemes - Changeover from old to new - Recruitment advertisement date governs applicability - Delay in process attributable to employer cannot prejudice employee - Judicial pronouncements mandating option for old scheme extend to autonomous bodies following Central Government notifications. (Paras 4, 5, 14)

Facts of the case:
Applicant retired as PRT in 2021, appointed in 2005 against 2003 advertisement for teacher posts. Recruitment stages: written exams in Dec 2003 & Feb 2004, interview Apr 2004, results May 2004, joining Feb 2005. Covered under NPS; sought switch to old pension scheme. Tribunal initially allowed, High Court remanded for OM 03.03.2023 applicability.

Findings of Court:
OM dated 03.03.2023 covers case as advertisement pre-dates NPS notification; autonomous body must follow amendments to adopted scheme per judicial analogy.

Issues: Applicability of OM dated 03.03.2023 to autonomous body employees; entitlement to old pension for pre-NPS advertisement recruitments despite post-cutoff joining and NPS acceptance in appointment letter.

Ratio Decidendi: Autonomous bodies adopting Central NPS must implement subsequent changes via OMs based on court decisions; pre-22.12.2003 advertisement qualifies for old scheme option, overriding later NPS stipulation.

Result: O.A. allowed. Directed extension of old pension scheme with consequential benefits.

Table of Content
1. applicant joined post-nps advertisement; initially under nps. (Para 2)
2. pre-nps advertisement entitles old pension scheme option. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. kvs autonomous; nps adopted post-2004; joining post-cutoff. (Para 6)
4. high court remands for om 03.03.2023 applicability. (Para 9 , 10)
5. om not for autonomous bodies; countered by bombay hc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. kvs must apply om changes due to nps adoption. (Para 14)
7. extend old pension to applicant with benefits. (Para 15)

ORDER

By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)

Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:

“(i) To issue an order or direction directing the respondents to extend the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 instead of National Pension System to the applicant.

(ii) To issue an order or direction directing the respondents to revert back the deductions made as per the National Pension System to the G.P.F. Account as per the provisions of the Old Pension Scheme under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.

(iii) To grant all the consequential relief which the applicant is entitled for.

(iv) To grant any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

(v) To award the cost.”

2. The brief facts of this case are that the Applicant retired on 30.11.2021 as PRT in Grade Pay Rs.4600/-. He had applied in response to the advertisement published by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) dated 13-19 September, 2003 for the post of teachers in the year 2004-2005. The appointment letter was issued to the applicant by the Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Silchar Region on 04.02.2005 and the applicant joined on 21.02.2005. On 03.10.2006, the applicant was regularized from the initial date of joining i.e. 21.02.2005. Vide letter No. F.110230(NPS)2019-KVS(HQ)PF/1270 dated 14.11.2019 sent by the Assistant Commissioner (Finance), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), New Delhi to the Under Secretary (UT-2), Ministry of HRD, New Delhi, it was informed that the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, which is an autonomous body under the Ministry of Education, adopted the National Pension System w.e.f. 01.01.2004 after approval from Board of Governors of the Sangthan in its meeting held on 04.10.2004. The Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan issued directions vide letter dated 12.03.2004 to all the Regional Offices for implementation of National Pension System in respect of employees joining services on or after 01.01.2004. Vide PPAN Statement issued by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office, Lucknow for the year 2008-2009, the applicant came to know that deduction in respect of National Pension System from his salary started from 2008-2009. The applicant gave representation to the respondent on 23.09.2021 and 06.10.2021 regarding his inclusion in the Old Pension Scheme. When no order was passed by the respondents, the applicant had approached this Tribunal through this O.A. which was decided on 25.01.2024 as under:-

16. If the facts of the present matter are compared with the ratio laid down in aforementioned cases, certainly post had been advertised prior to the implementation of new pension scheme, selection process (written examination) had been conducted. Applicant’s claim will also not be defeated because condition had been incorporated in the joining letter regarding acceptance of new pension scheme. Thus, in our considered view, service conditions, prevailing on the date recruitment process commenced, cannot be permitted to be altered in disadvantage of the recruitees. In the instant case, the process of selection has stated in the year 2003 and new pension scheme came into existence on 22.12.2003, therefore, the case law relied upon by the applicant fully supports the case of the applicant and we are of the opinion that applicant is entitled for old pension scheme because at the time of filing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top