SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13730

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunita Arjun Dhadve – Appellant
Versus
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre – Respondent


ORDER

Per: Santosh Mehra, Member (A)

The applicant has filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:

“8.a. This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case from the Respondents and after examining the same quash and set aside the order dated 17.09.2019 28.11.2019, 04.11.2020 and 14.12.2020 with all consequential benefits.

8.b. This Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the Respondents to extend the benefit as per the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union India Vs Avtar Singh referred above.

8.c. This Hon'ble Tribunal may further be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the candidature of the Applicant for the post of Work Assistant / A on compassionate ground with all consequential benefits.

8.d. Costs of the application be provided for”.

2. The grievance of the applicant is that, by the impugned orders, the respondents have illegally and arbitrarily cancelled the candidature of the applicant for grant of Compassionate Appointment on the ground that the applicant suppressed the fact of pending criminal case in her attestation form.

3. Facts in brief can be sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top