Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S Sujatha, Judicial Member
R.Nanda Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and vrs notice (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on fr 56(k) eligibility (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents' defense on organizational needs (Para 5 , 13) |
| 4. fr 56(k)(1) conditions for voluntary retirement (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. impugned orders and alternative arrangements (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. precedents limiting vrs withholding grounds (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. vrs withholdable only under fr 56(k)(1)(c) (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. quashing orders and directing vrs consideration (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
The applicant has filed this application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate order or direction to quash the impugned orders bearing No.CSB-17(21)/94-ES.I (Vol.II) and No.CSB/MS/PA/2023-24 both dated 04.03.2024 issued by Respondent No.2 vide Annexure A7 and A8 respectively as the same is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, without application of mind and violative of not only FR 56 (k)(c) but also violative of Articles14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
(ii) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd Respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
