Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S. SUJATHA, Judicial Member, SANJIV KUMAR, Administrative Member
Santhosh Kumar M – Appellant
Versus
Union India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application seeks quashing of discharge orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents justify proportionate penalty for absence. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. tribunal reviews records and contentions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. applicant admitted charges in inquiry. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. appeal rejected for delay; revision confirmed penalty. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. grounds rejected; absence wilful serious misconduct. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. application dismissed; penalty proportionate. (Para 20) |
ORDER
PER: DR. SANJIV KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
This Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal’s Act. 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) To quash the (i) Memo No.ADA/GDS/MSK/DLGS dated at Bengaluru – 560 025 the 18.11.2021, issued by the respondent No.4, Annexure A5, (ii) Order No.F/Disc-12/2020-21/Appeal dated at Bengaluru – 560 025 the 20.6.2023, issued by the respondent No.3, Annexure A9 and (iii) Order No.BGR/VIG/10-3/SKM/2023 dtd Bengaluru – 560 001, the 29.09.2023, issued by the respondent No.2, Annexure A13,
(ii) Direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant with all consequential benefits with full pay and allowances and continuity of service from t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
