CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Krishna, A, Shri M.G. Sewlikar, J
Ms. Anupama Raut Alias Anupama Narnaware – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through The Secretary, Ministry of Labour & Employment – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.08/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial facts and background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the inquiries and previous charges. (Para 3) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (Administrative)
The Applicant, aggrieved by two chargesheets dated 21st April, 2023 and 30th August, 2023 which culminated in passing of the order of dismissal from service dated 11th December, 2023, has filed this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 to quash and set aside the above chargesheets and order of dismissal and to reinstate the applicant in service with all consequential benefits including backwages.
2 . Brief facts, as stated in the OA, are that the applicant was appointed as Lower Division Clerk on 26th September, 1994 and subsequently, promoted to the post of Senior Clerk in March, 2012. The applicant filed a police complaint at the police station at Nagpur on 11th April, 2012 against four officials for sexual harassment on the basis of which a criminal case No.3470/2014 cause to be filed which is pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur. The applicant had also filed a complaint to the Secretary (Respondent No.1) on 07th May, 2012 for redressal of her grievance about sexual harassment at workplace. The applicant was issued a charge memorandum dated 22nd May, 2012 alleging that instead of approaching the Complaints Committee constituted by CBWE on 23rd February, 2010 to deal with the cases of sexual harassment, the applicant had directly approached the police and press and thus bypassed the well laid down official procedure and failed to keep the oath taken by her and indulged in such activities which is against the Establishment Rules. The Inquiry was conducted and the Inquiry Officer held that charges were not proved beyond reasonable doubt and also looking at her satisfactory performance of official duties, the charges were dropped.
2.1 It is averred that on her complaint of sexual harassment addressed to the Secretary (Respondent No.1), the inquiry committee was constituted. However, since the applicant had complained against the highest authority of the department, she did not participate in the inquiry and had intimated that she is not having any faith on the committee for the reason that the committee is working under respondent No.2 against whom she had filed the said complaint and, accordingly, the report was submitted holding that the charges levelled against the applicant could not be proved. It has been submitted that after the first chargesheet was dropped vide order dated 22nd March, 2013, the respondents have again issued the charge memorandum dated 21st April, 2023 alleging that the applicant had levelled serious false allegations against four senior officials in 2012 and without prior intimation to her office and approaching the Internal Sexual Harassment Committee had approached directly to the Local Newspaper/Press and lodged a complaint at Nagpur Police Station in 2012 against four senior most officials of the Board. It has been submitted that the second charge sheet dated 21st April, 2023 is similar to the one which was issued on 22nd May, 2012 which was drafted on 22nd March, 2013. Thus, the respondents have issued second chargesheet on the same facts on which first chargesheet was served and subsequently dropped. It has been submitted that the applicant on the basis of second chargesheet in which inquiry has been again conducted, she had submitted that she does not wish to persue the said complaint as the matter is sub-judice . But inspite of that, the Inquiry Officer concluded that the charges are proved and submitted its report dated 26th September, 2023 to impose a major penalty for tarnishing the image of the Board and to avoid illegal activity by an employee in future in the Board.
2.2 It has been submitted that on receipt of report of the Inquiry Officer, the applicant submitted her reply dated 27th October, 2023 in which she has stated that since the issue pertains to incident almost a de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.