Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S Sujatha, Judicial Member
Dr.Seshadri Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's pension revision claims and history (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' contentions on vi cpc pension parity (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. undisputed pension fixations for 2005 and 2016 (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. prior judgments mandate 2006-2015 pension revision (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. entitlement to revised pension per 2008 resolution (Para 11) |
ORDER (ORAL)
The applicant has filed this application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) quash the decision of the III-Respondent communicated in the letter No.AT/PSB/VIII/SBI/ CPPC/HYD dated 04.05.2020 at Annexure A3.
(ii) quash the decision of the II-Respondent communicated in the letter No.DRDL/1001/3/SA/PENSION CELL dated 15.01.2021 at Annexure A5.
(iii) modify the Annexure: A2, corrigendum PPO No.CCORRMISC0002992019 dated 08.08.2019, issued by the III-Respondent as to the rate of pension of Rs.24,295/- p.m. to Rs.28,170/- p.m. with effect from 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2015 and the rate of pension of Rs.69,550/- p.m. to Rs.73,800/- from 01.01.2016.
(iv) direct the Respondents to pay the applicant interest at the rate of GPF interest on the arrears of pension due to the applicant as specified in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
