Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Baijanti Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's argument regarding option for pension scheme. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's observations on applicable om. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding delay and laches in claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court analysis regarding evidence and past conduct. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. ratio decidendi on option finality and implications. (Para 8 , 11 , 13) |
| 6. final conclusion on the merits of the application. (Para 9) |
ORDER
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J):
Succinctly, the case of the applicant is that on 12.09.1985 she joined as TGT (English) in Visakhapatnam under the CPF Scheme in vogue. The Govt. of India, as a matter of policy, on the recommendation th of the 4 CPC, issued OM dated 01.05.1987 for change over of the employees from CPF to Pension Scheme based on which, the KV issued OM on 01.09.1988 stipulating conditions as under:
“F.No. 152-1/79-80/KVS/Budget/Part.ll Dated: 01.09.88
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject:- Change over of the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan employees from the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme to Pension Scheme.
…………..
In the 51st Meeting of the Board of Governor of the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan held on 31 May, 1988, it was approved that Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan wil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
