Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, J, Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, ACJ
M.Simhachalam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of applicants and their claims. (Para 1) |
| 2. common relief sought for pension increments. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. government's policy decision post supreme court directive. (Para 4) |
| 4. tribunal's directive on notional increments for pension. (Para 5) |
| 5. disposition of cases at admission stage. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORAL ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Judicial Member)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By these Original Applications, applicants are praying for similar relief, viz., seeking a direction to the Respondents to grant one notional increment from 1st July / 1st January, as the case may be, for the purpose of pension and pensionary benefits with all other consequential benefits.
3. Since the issue involved in all these OAs is common, by the consent of the both the sides, matters have been taken up for consideration at the admission stage.
4. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, after the Supreme Court’s direction, the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training, vide its OM No.19/116/2024-Pers.Pol.(Pay)(Pt), dated 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
