CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anil Kumar Ojha, Judicial Member, Pankaj Kumar, Administrative Member
Brij Rani Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. back wages depend on employee fault vs employer prevention (Para 5) |
ORDER(ORAL)
Per Hon’bleMr.Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative
In this case, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:
(a) To quash the impugned order dated 31.08.2012 so far as it relates to withholding the back wages to the applicant for the intervening period of 23.12.2000 to 27.07.2011.
(b) Direct the opposite parties to pay the back wages to the applicant for the period of 23.12.2000 to 27.07.2011 with 18% interest along with other consequential and monitory benefits.
(c) Any other suitable order or direction which the Hon’ble tribunal may deem fit just and proper under facts and circumstances of the case be passed.
(d) Allow the application with cost.”
2.1 The facts of the case are that the applicant was appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher – Sanskrit (TGT – Sanskrit) in 1992 and posted to Kendriya Vidyalaya (KV), Surat. She filed a complaint regarding sexual harassment against the Principal of KV, Surat to higher authorities and also to the National Commission for Women (NCW). Vide order dated 13.12.2000, the applicant was transferred to KV, Jhanor where she did not join. The respondents iss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.