SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14680

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MRS. SHALINI MISRA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Ch.Koteswara Rao, Gr-C, S/o Saidaiah, Aged 44 yrs, Occ:GDS BPM, Seetharampuram BO – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, rep. by the Secretary to the Govt. of India – Respondent
OA.No.021/0776/2019 and O.A.No.020/0777/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.B.Gurudas
For the Respondents: Mrs.K.Rajitha, Sr. PC for CG, Mrs.B.Gayatri Varma, Sr.CGSC

The principle of 'equal pay for equal work' is recognized, but Gramin Dak Sevaks cannot claim parity with regular employees due to specific engagement rules limiting their work hours.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14, 21, and 39(d) - Equal pay for equal work - Applicants challenged denial of pay for 8 hours of work by respondents - Claimed violation of equal pay principle. - Court found that GDS are part-time employees governed by specific rules limiting work to 5 hours and are not entitled to parity with regular employees. Court noted, "the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' is not expressly declared by our Constitution to be a fundamental right but must be interpreted as a constitutional goal." (Paras 12, 24, 42)

(B) Doctrine of Equal Pay for Equal Work - Article 39(d) enshrines the doctrine of equal pay for equal work; this case emphasized the need for judgment to align with existing rules governing GDS work. (Paras 4, 11, 18).

Facts of the case:
Applicants are GDS Branch Postmasters, alleging denial of pay for extra hours worked and asserting violation of their rights under the Constitution. They clarified that Branch Postmasters are performing extended work due to increasing responsibilities but are only compensated for 5 hours. (Para 2-5)

Findings of Court:
Denial of equal pay claim was found valid due to governing rules, establishing GDS as part-time roles constrained to 5 hours daily. (Paras 43).

Issues: Whether GDS are entitled to equal pay for equal work given their reduced hours and specific engagement rules? (Paras 7, 36)

Ratio Decidendi: Court reinforced that GDS status as part-time employees governed by rules limiting their work week invalidates claims for equal pay in the same scale as full-time employees. (Paras 24, 45)

Result: Applications dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to non-payment of wages. (Para 1 , 2)
2. gds branch postmasters' workload. (Para 3 , 4)
3. historical context of indian post office. (Para 5 , 6)
4. injustice in pay structure for gds. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. legal basis for equal pay for equal work. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. nature and rules governing gds employment. (Para 13 , 14)
7. assessment and review of gds workload. (Para 15 , 16)
8. residing in bo village as part of employment conditions. (Para 17)
9. nature of gds employment outside civil service. (Para 18)
10. historical establishment and review of gds system. (Para 19 , 20)
11. gds duties vs regular employees. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
12. committees' recommendations on gds remuneration. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
13. differentiation between gds and regular employees. (Para 27 , 28)
14. judicial restraint in policy matters. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
15. hearing and consideration process. (Para 32)
16. consideration of workload increases. (Para 33)
17. final judgment on gds workload and pay. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)

ORDER

PER HON‟BLE MRS. SHALINI MISRA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both these OAs, the same are being disposed of by this Common Order.

2. The applicants in both the OAs have challenged the action on the part of the respondents in denying them the pay and allowances/wages for 8.00 hrs duty for the work done on par with the regular employees in violation of the doctrine of „equal pay for equal work‟ enshrined under Article 39(D) of the Constitution of India and sought for the following relief:

“To call for the records pertaining to denial of pay and allowances by the respondents for the 8.00 hrs work done by the applicants and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Rules and instructions prescribed and in violation of the principles of natural justice and the Articles 14, 21 and 39 (d) of the Constitution of India , and direct the respondents to grant pay and allowances for 8.00 hrs on par with the regular Departmental employees performing similar and identical duties, not less than the pay of MTS (Rs.18,000/-) with effect from the date from which they are performing such duties, and pass such other order or other orders as this Tribunal deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”

3. For the sake of brivity, the facts stated in O.A.No.776/2019 are taken.

4. The first applicant is a GDS Branch Postmaster and also duly elected Circle Secretary belonging to National Union for GDS affiliated to FNPO. He is authorized to represent the grievances of GDS employees at various forums in the department. The other applicants are also working as GDS Branch Postmasters at the different places in Telangana Postal Circle.

5. The applicants have submitted that the Indian Post Office has got an interesting historical background. The 1st Post Office was started in British India in the year 1764. Since then, the number of Post Offices increased gradually in tune with the growing needs of the Society. At the time of Independence, there were 22,344 Post Offices. The same has crossed to 1,54,866 as on date. Out of which 15,826 (10%) are in Urban areas; 1,39,040 (90%) in Rural areas. Out of 1,39,040 as many as 1,29,420 are the Branch Post Offices. The castle of Postal system was built upon the well laid foundation of BOs. Initially, Teachers, Shopkeepers, Pensioners etc., were appointed as Branch Post Mastrs (BPMs), who were attending to collection, dispatch, receipt and delivery of mail of both registered and unregistered. Subsequently, S.B.Money Order etc. work was introduced. In course of time, in view of the multifarious functions, the role of a BO is changed enormously, particularly after the introduction of NREGS, old age pensions etc. in addition seasons and other activities were also entrusted to the Branch Post Offices (BO) and has become single window for all the activities including Mail, Saving

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top