SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14748

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Judicial Member, Suchitto Kr. Das, Administrative Member
Anumita Das Kundu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A. 350/01141/2023



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. B. Nandy
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Mukherjee, Mr. R. Bose, Ms. S. Bhaduri

Divorced daughter ineligible for family pension unless divorce proceedings filed during pensioner's lifetime per CCS Pension Rules.

Headnote:Under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (Rule 54) and CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 (Rule 50(9)(j)(iii), (vi)), family pension eligibility for divorced daughters requires proceedings filed during lifetime of employee/pensioner/spouse. Facts reveal father died in 2008, mother (pensioner) in 2020; divorce petition filed post-2020, decree in 2021. Court finds applicant ineligible as proceedings not instituted timely; dependency post-separation insufficient without compliance. Issues framed: Whether divorced daughter qualifies absent divorce filing during pensioner's lifetime. Ratio: Strict adherence to Rule 50(9)(j)(vi) mandates proceedings during lifetime; post-death filing disqualifies despite dependency claims or court observations in divorce decree. Original Application dismissed; claim rejected.

Table of Content
1. facts of father's death, mother's pension, applicant's marriage, separation, divorce, and pension claim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents deny eligibility due to post-death divorce filing. (Para 3)
3. rejoinder and timeline confirmation of divorce post-pensioner death. (Para 4 , 6)
4. claim rejected; oa dismissed for non-compliance with pension rules. (Para 5 , 9 , 10)
5. rules require divorce proceedings during pensioner's lifetime for eligibility. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER (Oral)

Per Mr. Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Judicial Member:

The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking following relief:-

“a) An Order do issue directing thereby the concerned respondent authority to issue necessary order for disbursement of family pension in favour of the applicant within a stipulated period of time;

b) A direction do issue upon the concerned respondent authorities to produce and/or cause to be produced all records relating to the instant application before the Hon’ble Tribunal for administering conscionable justice and to command them to act strictly in accordance with law;

c) And/orto pass such other or further Order or Orders as to this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.”

2. The brief facts of the case are as under:-

2.1. The father of the applicant, Shri Joydeb Das, who was a regular employee and posted as Junior Telecom Officer, BSNL, Malda, died on 19.05.2008.

2.2. After sudden demise of the father of the applicant, the authority issued family pension in favour of her mother, namely Smt. Kakoli Das vide FPPO No CAA/WBS/FPPO-2002/08-09.

2.3. It is submitted that during the life time of the father of the applicant she was dependent on him. After the death of her father, she got married on 09.12.2012. But after few years of her marriage, due to torture imposed upon her at her in-laws house, she was compelled to return to her paternal house and had accordingly started residing with her mother from 10.05.2018 onwards as a dependent daughter. Subsequently, the mother of the applicant also died on 02.04.2020.

2.4. A Matrimonial Suit No. 49 of 2021 was filed for dissolution of her marriage and the said Matrimonial Suit was allowed by a decree of divorce dated 04.09.2021 (Annexure A/3 refer).

2.5. Thereafter, the applicant submitted a representation dated 07.01.2022 before the Telecom District Manager, BSNL, Malda seeking disbursement of Family Pension in her favour since she had no separate income and her status was that of a divorce woman, who was solely dependent on the income of her mother, when her mother was alive and long before institution of the Matrimonial Suit.

She also submits that the Learned Court of the District Judge, Malda has also recorded in the order dated 04.09.2021 that the applicant had started living separately from the husband since 2019 i.e. prior to institution of the Matrimonial Suit. The said observations in the order dated 04.09.2021 clearly indicates that the applicant was solely dependent on her mother’s income during her lifetime.

2.6. The applicant further states that the AGM (HR & Admin), BSNL, Malda sent a letter vide No. QD-74/FP/2022-23/16 dated 01.04.2022 to the Office of the Controller of Communication Accounts, West Bengal Circle regarding issuance of family pension in favour of the applicant. However, after issuance of such communication family pension has not been disbursed in her favour by the concerned authority.

2.7. The applicant further stated that in the Order dated 04.09.2021 passed in Matrimonial Suit No. 49 of 2021 it has clearly been recorded that the applicant started living separately from her husband on and from 10.05.2018, hence she was fully dependent on her mother’s income, and, as such, she was fully entitled for family pension being a divorcee daughter in terms of Rule 50 (9)(j)(iii) and Rule 50(9) (a)(ii) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) rules, 2021.

2.8. It is also submitted that the applicant had submitted her represen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top