Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A), M. Swaminathan, Member(J)
Manjunath I. Pujar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. administrative accountability and representation. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. promotion eligibility and procedural adherence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial review of dpc decision-making. (Para 9 , 16) |
| 4. disciplinary findings impact on promotion. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 5. determination of final outcome. (Para 22 , 25) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A))
This OA has been filed by the applicant seeking the following relief :-
“A. ....the OA may kindly be allowed with a direction to the respondents to promote the applicant from 01.04.2018, the original date when he was due for promotion from ACIT to DCIT, with all consequential benefits;
B. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be issued in favour of the applicant.”
2. In the order, dt. 23.01.2020, this Tribunal had cited the orders passed on 17.12.2019, 19.12.2019 and 09.01.2020, relevant portions of which are extracted below :-
“
......
“19.12.2019 CVS(MA)
........
In this matter the prayer is for consideration of the applicant for promotion with effect from 01.04.2018. The subsequent DPC held on 31.12.2018 has app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
