SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14942

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial Member, Pramod Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Bhupendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
OA No. 751 of 2017



Advocates:
For the applicant: Mr. R K Rout, counsel
For the respondents: Mr. G R Verma, counsel

Resignation withdrawal acceptance condones service interruption per DOPT OM; invalidates subsequent disciplinary action for unauthorized absence.

Headnote:The judgment addresses violations of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 (R.14, R.16) and CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 (R.26(4)-(6)), corresponding to Civil Service Regulations Art. 418(b), alongside DOPT OM dated 11.02.1988 on resignation procedures. Essential facts involve the applicant's resignation on 08.07.2014 due to family pressures, delayed processing with piecemeal dues demands (Rs.82,295/- and Rs.12,000/- bond), non-acceptance vide 04.03.2015 letter, unauthorized absence allegation till 15.06.2015 rejoining, initiation of disciplinary enquiry (DE) on 30.04.2015, major penalty of pay reduction on 07.01.2016, and upheld appeals/revisions. The Tribunal found initial departmental actions illegal, quashed DE, penalty, and subsequent orders, condoning absence period sans qualifying service. Key issues framed: validity of DE post resignation non-acceptance and withdrawal allowance; compliance with resignation withdrawal rules under DOPT OM and Pension Rules. Ratio: Resignation processing must be prompt without phased dues recovery; post-withdrawal acceptance (12.01.2016) deems interruption condoned per DOPT OM para 5, nullifying unauthorized absence charge (para 8); delayed responses and rule non-adherence vitiate DE and penalties ab initio. OA allowed; all impugned orders quashed; absence period condoned as dies non (no work, no pay); no costs.

Table of Content
1. challenges to disciplinary charges, resignation, and penalties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents defend proceedings; applicant reiterates claims. (Para 3 , 4)
3. dopt guidelines on resignation withdrawal procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. illegal processing invalidates de and punishment. (Para 8)
5. oa allowed; orders quashed, absence condoned. (Para 9)

ORDER 

Mr. Pramod Kumar Das, A.M.

The applicant challenging the memorandum of charges under Annexure A/13 series, penalty order vide Annexure A/22, appellate authority order dated 11.03.2016 (A/26) and revisional authority order dated 06.06.2017 (A/28) has filed this OA praying for the following reliefs:

a) The impugned order dated 30.04.2015 to hold disciplinary enquiry along with the memorandum of charges filed under Annexure A/13 series may be quashed being passed in violation of provisions of Pension Rule regarding acceptance of resignation.

b) The major penalty order dated 07.01.2016 (A/22) which has been passed by the disciplinary authority (Respondent No. 4) on being illegally influenced by the action and ill motive Respondent No. 4 may be quashed by declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable.

c) The appellate authority order dated 11.03.2016 (Annexure A/26) which has also been passed by the Respondent No. 3 in a pre-decided manner with malafide intention may also be quashed being an outcome of ulterior motive of the Respondent No. 3 & 4.

d) The revisional order dated 1/6.6.2017 (Annexure A/28) passed by the Respondent No. 2 also be quashed being passed without application of mind and proper appreciation of applicant’s case.

e) The respondents may be directed to extent all service benefits which the applicant have suffered includes financial loss and seniority because of imposition of major penalty award passed on 7.1.2016 filed under Annexure A/22 and applicant may be restored to his position in the seniority list forthwith and may be promoted to the post of ACIO – I w.e.f. 15.07.2015 when his batch mates and persons remained in the seniority list have been promoted to that post. Further the arrears which are to be calculate after restoring the applicant in his promotional post and previous time scale position may also be paid to the applicant.

f) Any other order(s) as may deemed just and proper may be passed in order to give complete relief to the applicant.

2. The brief facts of the case as inter alia averred in the OA is that the applicant was initially posted at Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (SIB), Meerut in June 2010 and thereafter was transferred to SIB Bhubaneswar just before completion of his tenure at SIB, Meerut therefore not allowing the applicant to exercise any option for posting as per policy of Annual General Transfer (AGT). It is submitted that the applicant had joined SIB Bhubaneswar on 11.01.2013 and had applied for home state postings in AGT 2013, 2014 and 2017 but his requests for transfers were turned down. It is submitted that due to family duties/responsibilities and service related duties/responsibilities the applicant was under pressure and he had applied for 10 days EL on 08.07.2014 w.e.f. 06.07.2015 to 20.07.2014 mentioning about illness of his wife and newborn baby with an undertaking to join duties after completion of his leave. It is submitted that his leave application was submitted before DCIO, Angul which was forwarded to Bhubaneswar Office on 08.07.2014 but nothing was communicated to him till night of 08.07.2014. It is submitted that the applicant had submitted his resignation before the DCIO Angul at about 10.20 pm and left for his native thereafter. It is submitted that earlier too his applications for EL were rejected by the respondent no. 4. It is submitted that the DCIO, Angul forwarded the resignation letter to the office of Respondent NO. 3 & 4 and they started processing the same without taking into consideration the mental and social condition of the applicant which shows their intention as malafide. It is submitt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top