Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. Shrivastava, J
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of deceased employee's family and prior proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. circular prioritizes first wife; inapplicable post her death. (Para 4 , 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. natural justice cases inapplicable without stay order. (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. applicant's manipulated date of birth disqualifies claim. (Para 14) |
| 5. priority to surviving second wife; oa dismissed. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
This OA has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 on 07.12.2022 against the order dated 24.11.2022 by which the claim of the applicant for compassionate appointment has been rejected. The applicant claimed the following relief(s) in Para-8 of the OA:-
“8.1 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass the direction commanding the Respondent No. 3 (Workshop Officer (Personnel), Mechanical Workshop North Eastern Railway at Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur), to set aside the impugned letter dated 24-11-2022 and stay the impression thereof.
8.2 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously further also be pleased to pass the direction commanding the Respondent No. 2 (Chief Workshop Manager (Personnel), North Eastern Railway, Mechanical Workshop at Gorakhpu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
