CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pramod Kumar Das, A, Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J
Manoranjan Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges promotion rights. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. orders based on government policy. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial review limited on policy. (Para 8 , 12) |
ORDER
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
The applicant, Sri Manoranjan Mishra, working as Jr. Field Assistant (Air Craft Assistant) in ARC Charbatia, being aggrieved by the order dated 19.09.2014 (A/13), OM dated 19.11.2014 (A/14) and the order dated 18.01.2016 (A/17) has filed this OA with the following reliefs:
“a) admit and issue notices to the Respondents requiring them to file their show-cause/counter to the present Original Application within a stipulated period;
b) and if they fail to show cause, or caused insufficiently, then call for the relevant records from the custody of the Respondent No. 1, 2 & 3;
c) and after perusing the pleadings of both the parties and hearing them, allow this Original Application by quashing the impugned order dtd. 19.09.2014 in Annexure-A/13 and subsequent order dtd. 19.11.2014 in Annexure-A/14 as well as the order dtd. 18.01.2016 of the Respondent No.3, and issue an appropriate order directing the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to review the cadre of promotional avenue of the Applicant in the G
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.