SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15035

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Krishan Chandra Mishra And Ors – Appellant
Versus
E-in-c – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER

The present Original Application has been filed by the applicants seeking relief that the respondents be directed to grant the benefits of one notional grade increment to the applicants w.e.f. 1st July of their respective year of retirement for the purpose of calculating the pension and other retirement benefits, including gratuity and leave encashment etc. and thereafter revised pension and other retirement benefits and pay them arrears of pension and other retirement benefits with interest @ rate of 9% per annum with all consequential benefits.

2. The brief facts of the case, as stated by the applicants, are that they retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30th June of their respective year of retirement. They had outstanding service record in their entire service career. After the sixth pay commission report, the Central Government fixed 1st July as the date of increment for all employees by making amendment in the various Rules including Rule 10 of Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, due to which the applicant was denied the benefit of one grade increment on account of retirement on 30th June i.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top