Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Krishan Chandra Misra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. oa disposed with directions at admission stage. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 16) |
| 2. retirement on 30th june after full year service denies 1st july increment. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. precedents affirm entitlement to notional increment despite retirement timing. (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. grant increment, refix pension, restrict arrears to three years. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER (Oral)
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicants seeking relief that the respondents be directed to grant the benefits of one notional grade increment to the applicants w.e.f. 1st July of their respective year of retirement for the purpose of calculating the pension and other retirement benefits, including gratuity and leave encashment etc. and thereafter revised pension and other retirement benefits and pay them arrears of pension and other retirement benefits with interest @ rate of 9% per annum with all consequential benefits.
2. The brief facts of the case, as stated by the applicants, are that they retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30th June of their respective year of retirement. They had outstanding service re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
