Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
Savitri Devi @ Sabbo Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of delayed compassionate appointment claim post-death in harness. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' contentions on prior refusal, eligibility, and delay relaxation rules. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. undisputed facts of widow's offered but refused appointment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. refusal infers no destitution; delay bars future claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. supreme court principles limit compassionate relief to immediate crisis; oa dismissed. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
The instant OA has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking relief to set aside the impugned order dated 14.10.2015 served upon the applicant in February 2016, and to direct the respondents to appoint the applicant No. 2 under dying-in-harness rules in the place of his deceased father in concerned department and to award cost.
2. The fact of the applicant is that the husband of applicant No. 1, and father of applicant No. 2 late raj Bahadur Singh was Points- man Grade „A‟ in the respondent department and he died on duty on 13.02.2000 leaving behind his widow, three minor sons and a minor daughter and another son from his first wife. Initially the applicant No. 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
