Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anil Kumar Ojha, Member-J, Pankaj Kumar, Member-A
Devendra Vikram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee removal challenged after disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. unexplained 20-year delay opposed. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 13) |
| 3. precedents affirm strict laches application. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. delay not condoned; oa dismissed. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Ojha, Member (J)
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
2. Applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
(i) to set aside the impugned order dated 20.10.1989 passed by the Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway and removal order dated 29.10.1986 passed by the Respondent No. 2, as contained in Annexure No. 3 & 6 respectively to this Original Application.
(ii) to direct the opposite parties to reinstate the services of the Applicant on the basis of seniority as per the order passed by Civil Court.
(iii) to pass such other which this Hon‟ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.
(iv) award the cost of Original Application in favour of the Applicant.
3. It is the case of the applicant that applicant was the employee of the Respondent- Railway Department. Applicant jo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
