Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash, Member (J)
Devendra Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. father's death; compassionate claim rejected due to terminal benefits. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on discrimination and precedents. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. no right to appointment; delay and benefits disqualify claim. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. supreme court ratios on immediacy and financial crisis. (Para 10) |
| 5. oa dismissed; no merit in claim. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER
The applicant has filed the instant Original Application seeking the following relief(s):-
“(a) Issue an order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 2.6.2022 (Annexure no.1) passed by the Narcotics Commissioner, Central Bureauof Narcotics, Gwalior (respondent no.2)
(b) Issue an order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned communication/order dated 8.3.2017 (Annexure no.2) passed by the Assistant Narcotics Commissioner, Central Bureau of Narcotics, Gwalior (respondent no.3).
(c) Issue any other and further order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(d) Award the cost of the O.A. to the applicant. ”
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the father of the applicant namely Sri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
