Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and promotion claims from vacancy years. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. dispute over ee seniority fixation and dpc process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. parties' arguments citing precedents on limitation and eligibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court rejects 2012 claim due to limitation, accepts 2013-14. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. seniority from vacancy year w.e.f. 01.04.2013; direct review dpc for se. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
PER: RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, MEMBER (A)
1. Present original application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking following relief:-
(i) That the AISL of EE as on 03 Jan 2022 circulated by respondent No.3 vide letter dated 03.01.2022 (A-8) be quashed.
(ii) (ii) That directions be issued to respondents to fix the seniority of the applicant in the grade of AE with effect from 01.04.2001 and place the applicant appropriately in AISL above his juniors.
(iii) That directions be issued to the respondents to consider the applicant for promotion to the grade of EE against the vacancies for the year 2012-13, fix the seniority in the grade of EE with effect from 01.04.2012 and draw fresh AI
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
