Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RANJANA SHAHI, Judicial Member, LOK RANJAN, Administrative Member
Abdul Salam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. retirement on 30th june after full year service denies 1st july increment. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 2. precedents establish entitlement to notional increment for good service. (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. direct grant of increment, refix pension, limit arrears to three years. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER (Oral)
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The present OA has been filed by the applicant seeking for the following reliefs:-
“(i) By an appropriate order or direction in nature thereof, order dated 27.03.2024 May kindly be quashed and set aside.
(ii) By an appropriate order or direction, the respondents be directed to grant one notional grade increment to the applicant, w.e.f. 1st July 2019 for the purpose of calculating the retirement/pensionary benefits, including gratuity and leave encashment and accordingly, revised their retirement/pensionary benefits and thereafter pay him, arrears of retirement benefits and pension with interest @ rate of 9% per annum with all consequential benefits.
(iii) Any other order, direction or relief may be passed in favour of the applicant which may be deemed fit, just and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The bri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
