Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Lata Baswaraj Patne, J, Shalini Misra, Administrative Member
G.Sunitha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of cbi case, conviction, and initial departmental penalty. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior departmental penalty bars rule 19 action post-conviction. (Para 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. rule 19 allows penalty on conviction independent of prior proceedings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. separate criminal and departmental proceedings; rule 19 justified post-conviction. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. oa dismissed; direct final order on representation. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER
(Per Hon'ble Dr. Lata Baswaraj Patne, Member(J))
The applicant filed the present OA, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“… to call for the records pertaining to order F. No.5(4)/2006- Vigilance (Vol.II), dated 11.07.2017 and Memorandum No. 5(4)/2006-Vig. (Vol.II), dated 10/11.07.2017 and declare the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the said order of suspension and said Memorandum to impose a penalty of „removal from service‟ as illegal, arbitrary and null and void in law and set aside and quash the said Order and Memorandum and direct the respondents to revoke the suspension of the applicant forthwith with all consequential benefits, and allow
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
