Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Suresh Kumar Batra, Judicial Member
Jitender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. similar oas consolidated; claims interest on delayed retiral benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants cite precedents; respondents deny intentional delay. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court reviews delays in pension, gpf, gratuity payments. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. precedents establish interest entitlement for procedural delays. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. 8% interest ordered on delayed amounts from june 2022. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA MEMBER (J):-
1. Since the facts, relief claimed, grounds and law cited in support of the claim, in the three above captioned Original Applications are similar, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these are disposed of by a common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are taken from O.A. No. 521/2023 titled Jitender Singh Vs. Union of India and Others. The relief claim in these OAs is as under:-
(i) To direct the respondents to pay interest @ 18% per annum on the delayed payment of amount of pension and retiral dues, in the interest of justice with all consequential benefits.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that applicant was initially appointed as Constable in the office of respondents on 29.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
