SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15785

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Ajay Kumar Choubey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Original Application No. 330/234 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kaushlesh Pratap Singh
For the Respondents: Saurabh

Cancellation orders must contain reasons; cannot be justified by later affidavits. Non-speaking orders invalid.

Headnote:The applicant, a railway medical officer, sought permanent absorption in Tata Memorial Centre via technical resignation accepted on 28.03.2018. A promotion to Selection Grade under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme was granted w.e.f. 25.05.2018 but cancelled vide order dated 30.07.2019 without reasons. Court found the cancellation order cryptic and non-speaking, violating principles that orders must stand on their own reasons without supplementation via affidavits. Reference to S.19 of Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. Issues framed as whether cancellation was valid absent reasons and if applicant was entitled to promotion while on rolls till 29.05.2018. Ratio: Statutory orders must be judged by reasons stated therein; cannot be cured by later affidavits (Mohinder Singh Gill). Impugned order set aside; matter remanded for fresh reasoned decision within three months. OA disposed of without costs.

Table of Content
1. timeline of resignation, promotion, and erroneous cancellation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. dispute over junior's priority and lien status. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. arguments on non-speaking order and entitlement to promotion. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. impugned order invalid without reasons; cannot supplement via affidavit. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. set aside order; remand for reasoned decision. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

ORDER

By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):

Heard Shri Kaushlesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Saurabh, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing of the case.

2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:-

i. To issue order/direction to quash the order dated 30.07.2019 issued by the Railway Board

ii. To issue a direction to the respondents to implement the promotion order of the applicant in Selection Grade under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (DACP) as per Letter NO.E(O)III-2018/PM/05 dated 14.11.2018 with effect from 25.05.2018 with all consequential benefits.

iii. To issue any order or direction, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.

iv. To award cost to the applicant.

3. The facts leading to this Original Application as apparent from the record that the applicant was appointed vide order dated 06.05.2005 as Assistant Divisional Medical Officer (hereinafter referred as ‘ADMO’) and posted in the office of General Manager, Eastern Railway, Kolkata in the pay-scale of Rs.8000-13500/- +Grade Pay of Rs.5400/-. He joined on 25.05.2005 in the said office. Thereafter, he was promoted to the post of Divisional Medical officer on 25.05.2009 and posted at Indian Railway Cancer Institute, Varanasi in the pay- scale of Rs.15,600-39100+ Grade Pay of Rs.6600/- and further to the post of Senior Divisional Medical Officer on 25.05.2014 in the pay-scale of Rs.15600-39100+7600/-(Grade Pay).

4. It is further the case of the applicant as averred in original application that on 18.09.2017, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between Tata Memorial Centre (hereinafter referred as ‘TMC’) on behalf of Department of Atomic Energy and North Eastern Railway, Indian Railways, wherein it has been mentioned that after initial assessment jointly with Department of Atomic Energy(TMC) teams to transfer few of the existing staff as selected by Department of Energy (TMC) and offer them the suitable position on the rolls and terms and conditions of TMC on a permanent absorption, remaining manpower be re-developed by the Indian Railways.

5. In view thereof, the offer of appointment to the post of Assistant Radiation Oncologist ‘E’ was issued in favour of the applicant on 23.11.2017 by the TMC in the pay matrix of Level-12 with pay protection. Accordingly, the applicant moved an application on 30.11.2017 for his technical resignation to the Secretary, Railway Board, New Delhi with a request to relieve him for joining of new assignment. The said technical resignation of the applicant was forwarded along with one Sudhendu Shekhar to Secretary Establishment, Railway Board, New Delhi vide letter dated 10.01.2018. The said Sudhendhu Shekhar was relieved by the Medical Director, Cancer Research Institute, N.E. Railway, Varanasi vide letter dated 21.03.2018, ignoring the applicant’s application as the said Dr. Sudhendu Shekhar is three year junior to the applicant in JA grade.

6. Thereafter, the applicant was suffered from backache since 15.04.2018 and was under treatment and after declared medically fit, he joined the duties on 28.05.2018 and on that date, the applicant was informed that his application for technical resignation has been accepted by the Railway Board w.e.f. 28.03.2018 vide order dated 23.04.2018, so the applicant was spared on 29.05.2018 in compliance of the above order. However

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top