Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Mohan Pyare, A
Ajay Kumar Choubey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. timeline of resignation, promotion, and erroneous cancellation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. dispute over junior's priority and lien status. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments on non-speaking order and entitlement to promotion. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. impugned order invalid without reasons; cannot supplement via affidavit. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. set aside order; remand for reasoned decision. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):
Heard Shri Kaushlesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Saurabh, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing of the case.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:-
i. To issue order/direction to quash the order dated 30.07.2019 issued by the Railway Board
ii. To issue a direction to the respondents to implement the promotion order of the applicant in Selection Grade under Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (DACP) as per Letter NO.E(O)III-2018/PM/05 dated 14.11.2018 with effect from 25.05.2018 with all consequential bene
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
