Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
Moumita Paul – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to temporary attachment orders after prior litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no consent or rules for inter-divisional pa attachment. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. administrative exigency justifies temporary staffing. (Para 4) |
| 4. exigency from shortages, fraud, untrained staff upheld. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. limited judicial review of administrative transfers. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. dismiss oa; no interference with temporary orders. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Per: Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Judicial Member
In the instant O.A. it is the grievance of the applicant that while they are working as Postal Assistantat at Kolkata GPO and different Divisions of the Postal Department in Kolkata, the competent authority vide orders dated 07.02.2024, 13.02.2024 has decided to attach the service of the applicants on temporary basis i.e. for a period of three months to various Sub Offices at various locations. Their representation against said temporary transfer order also came to be rejected vide order dated 26.02.2024. Hence, being aggrieved, with the order dated 07.02.2024, 13.02.2024 and 26.02.2024 the applicants have approached this Tribunal in second round litigation under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
