SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15877

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
M/o Water Resources – Respondent
O.A./1323/2019



Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi O.A. No. 1323/2019 Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2024 Hon’ble Mr. R N Singh, Member (J)

Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A)

1. Anil Kumar, S/o Late Dhan Singh, aged 52 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o House No.291, Katra Sujaurai, Dilli Gate, Delhi-02.

2. Surinder Kumar, S/o Sh. Hari Ram, aged 52 years, Group D, working as a peon R/o House No.672/3 Ambedkarnagar, Hissar Road, Rohtak, Haryana.

3. Umed Singh Bhandari, S/o Late Vijay Singh Bhandari, aged 52 years, Group C, working as a driver, R/o House No. B2H-12, Janata Flat, Mayur Vihar, Phase-III, New Delhi-110093.

4. Mukesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Ram Yadav, aged 50 years, Group C, working as a driver, R/o Vill & P.O. Kanwarwas, Distt. Rewari, Haryana.

5. Balwan Singh, S/o Shri Sardar Singh, aged 50 years, Group D, working as a peon R/o Village Harsana Kalan, Distt.- Sonipat, Haryana.

6. Acche Lal, S/o Shri Jawahar Lal Verma, aged 48 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o P.O. Bhewsa, Gram- Bankata, Dist-

Gorkhpur.

7. Pitamber Dutt, S/o Late Madavanand Sati, aged 48 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o House No. A33/E, East Vinod Nagar, Delhi.

8. Anil Kumar, S/o Shri Subodh Prasad, aged 31 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o House No.D-16, Qutub Vihar-ll, New Delhi-110071.

9. Pramod Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Tejo Yadav, aged 32 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o Virajpur, Dist-Jamoi, P.S. Charam Mandi, P.O. Kiwal (Bihar)

10. Rekha Devi, W/o Nandu Ram, aged 39 years, Group D, working as a peon, R/o House No.22, Aliganj, Kotla, New Delhi.

11. Suresh, S/o Shri Shayam Lal, aged 48 years, Group D, working as a safaiwala, Pilanji, New Delhi-03 …..Applicant (Advocate: Mr. Shaileshwar Yadav)

Versus

1. Union of India Through the Secretary Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure North Block, New Delhi.

3. Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel and Training, North Block, New Delhi ...Respondents (Advocate: Mr. S.N.Verma)

O R D E R (ORAL)

Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)

We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and with their assistance we have also perused the relevant pleadings available on record.

2. By way of the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“a) Call for the records from office of Respondent No 1 and quashoffice order No F.14/CWDT/Admn/Vol XVI/100 dated 29.03.2018 wrongly and illegally terminating the services of the applicants and also letter No N-70013/1/2018-BM/158 dated 20.02.2019 vide which it was conveyed by respondent No 1 that the 33 posts stand abolished vide order issued by Respondent No 2, and also letter No F.No N-70015/1/2018-bm/192 dated 28.02.2019 issued by Respondent No 1 closing the liabilities of CWDT;

(b) direct the Respondent No 1 and 3 to regularize and absorb all the applicants in regular service of the Government of India, who all were working with Respondent No 1 continuously with temporary status in terms of the case taken up by Respondent No 1 vide letter dated 10.02.2015, to respondent No 3 with all consequential benefits including pay, seniority, increment and all other benefits as applicable to equal/corresponding permanent central government employee(s);

(c) Direct respondent No 1 to pay salary and all other allowances as per current pay scale applicable to central government employees of corresponding status and grade/level;

(d) issuesuch other order or further directions as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case”

3. In response to notice, respondents have filed counter reply and have prayed for dismissal of the O.A.

4. Undisputed facts are that the competent authority amongst the respondent no. 1 issued communication dated 27.07.1990

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top