SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15889

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Manoj Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
All India Radio – Respondent


ORDER

PER: URMITA DATTA (SEN), MEMBER (J):

The applicants state that the cause of action of the applicants is same and as such they pray for filing the common application under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987. Prayer is allowed.

2. This application has been preferred to seek the following relief:

“i) Fixation of pay of the applicants as Assistants in the Pay Band 2 (Rs.9300-34800) Rs.12540/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- w.e.f. the date of Promotion to the post of Assistant i.e. 14.11.2011 at par with the entry pay for direct recruits on or after 1.1.2006, as mandated by OM dated 28.09.2018 para 8 in particular (Annexure - 1).

(ii) Arrears be paid consequent upon the granting of prayer (i) above.

(iii) Any other relief or reliefs, the Hon’ble Tribunal is pleased to grant including cost of the case.”

3. The applicants were appointed as LDC on February, 1991 and were promoted as UDC on 21.06.2000 and 01.08.2001 respectively and has been subsequently promoted to the post of Assistant on 14.12.2011 and their pay has been fixed at Rs. 11,110/- with GP Rs. 4600/- and Rs. 10660/- with GP Rs. 4600/- respectively. Such promotion to the post of Assistant wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top