Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rameshwar Vyas, J, Amit Sahai, Administrative Member
Mohabbat Dan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prior eligibility lost after process cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on equity vs. fresh eligibility rules. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 14) |
| 3. no vested right; bona fide cancellation valid. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. oa dismissed; liberty for age relaxation. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Per Rameshwar Vyas :
Being aggrieved by communication dated 25.04.2024 (Annex.A/1) whereby respondent No.2 informed the applicant regarding his ineligibility to appear in the selection process for the post of Junior Engineer (Mechanical) against 25% intermediate quota pursuant to the Notification dated 18.03.2024 (Annex.A/9), the applicant has preferred this O.A. with prayer to quash and set aside the above communication as also, the list dated 10.04.2024 (Annex.A/2), wherein , his name was included in the list of candidates found ineligible to appear for the above post.
2. Facts of the case in brief are as under :-
Vide Notification dated 18.03.2024 (Annex.A/9) applications were invited from eligible candidates for the post of Junior Engineer (Mechanical) Level-VI against 25% intermediate quota for total eight posts including six posts in unreserved category. As pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
