Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
S Sujatha, J, Sanjiv Kumar, A
Suchetana Biswas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and exclusion from promotion list. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on eligibility, residency, and comparative merit. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. analysis of recruitment rules and fcs procedures. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. supreme court ruling mandates promotion from eligibility date. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. quash impugned orders and direct fresh promotion. (Para 16) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Per: Justice S.Sujatha ...........Member(J)
The applicant has filed this application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:
“a. Pass necessary orders declaring that the order passed by the Respondent No.2 excluding the Applicant is illegal, arbitrary and wrongful and as a consequent quash the order dated 06.07.2022 issued by the Respondent No.2 (Annexure A13) .
b. Pass necessary order declaring the response dated 17.08.2022 issued by the Respondent No.2 as illegal and consequently strike it down.
c. Pass necessary orders directing the Respondent No.2 to issue a fresh list including the name of the Applicant in the list of names of the candidates who are eligible to participate for promotion from Scientist ‘B’ to Scientist ‘C’.
d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
