SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 16202

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, Judicial Member, Hukum Singh Meena, Administrative Member
Gaurav Zalavadiya – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
OA No.168/2023|OA No.503/2024|OA No.622/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.L.Sharma
For the Respondents: S.D.Vasavada

Transfer order quashed for violating ESIC policy and DoP&T guidelines on spouse postings; central govt employee entitled to consideration near state govt spouse's station subject to vacancies, with reasoned orders mandatory.

Headnote:(A) ESIC Transfer Policy dated 20.06.2022 - Clauses 3.2, 4.4, 7.4, 7.10, 8 - DoP&T OM dated 24.11.2022 - Para B(vii) - Transfer of medical officer - Officer posted at same station for 14 years liable for transfer under tenure rules (maximum 6+3 years) - Spouse posting policy mandates consideration for posting central government employee at/near state government spouse's station subject to vacancies - Priority matrix and choices under transfer policy to be followed - Non-speaking orders by grievance committees vitiate process - Directions in prior OA for reasoned decision on representation not complied with - Violation of policy renders transfer order arbitrary - Competent authority to reconsider posting near spouse's station per policy. (Paras 2.2, 2.7, 7, 9, 10)

(B) Service Law - Transfer - Administrative exigencies permit all-India transfers but must adhere to binding policies including spouse considerations - Mere acceptance of all-India liability does not override policy entitlements - Seniority primary but not sole criterion; public interest balanced with employee convenience - Tribunal interferes where gross policy violation evident, without encroaching on transfer domain. (Paras 3.7, 6, 9.1, 9.2)

Facts of the case:
Medical officer appointed in 2010 at a hospital, continuously posted for 14 years. Submitted online choices for transfer after tenure exceeded policy limits. Wife employed as state government medical officer at nearby station, entitling 10 priority points. Transfer ordered to distant hospital ignoring choices, spouse ground, and priority matrix. Representations to grievance committees rejected via non-speaking orders. Prior OA disposed directing reasoned decision on representation, which remained unaddressed satisfactorily. Relieving order issued post-filing of current OA.

Findings of Court:
Transfer order dated 20.05.2023 set aside. Respondents directed to reconsider request for posting at/nearer station to spouse's posting as per ESIC policy and DoP&T guidelines wherever vacancy available.

Issues: Whether transfer order violated ESIC Transfer Policy and DoP&T spouse posting guidelines; validity of non-speaking rejection of representations; entitlement to priority for spouse posting despite all-India transfer liability and administrative needs.

Ratio Decidendi: Transfer policies are binding; spouse posting under DoP&T para B(vii) applicable where one spouse in central and other in state government, subject to vacancies. Non-adherence to clauses on choices, priority matrix, and reasoned orders renders transfer illegal. Tenure exceeded justifies transfer but location must follow policy hierarchy (clauses 3.2.1 to 3.2.5).

Result: OA allowed; impugned transfer quashed with directions for reconsideration.

Table of Content
1. applicant's background, appointment, and transfer challenge history. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents' defense of transfer policy and public interest. (Para 3 , 5)
3. applicant's arguments on policy violations and spouse posting. (Para 4)
4. court analysis of esic policy and dop&t spouse guidelines. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. set aside transfer; reconsider spouse posting. (Para 10)

ORDER

Per : Hon’ble Dr.Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)

Aggrieved with his transfer order dated 20.05.2023 bearing no.65 from Bapunagar Model Hospital, ESIC, Gujarat to ESIC Hospital Indore, the applicant has approached this Tribunal in the second stage litigation, praying for the following relief:-

“(A). The Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to quash and set aside recommendation of the Transfer Committee No.A- 22013/15/2023-MED-VI, Annexure A-1 and order No.65 dated 20-05-2023, Annexure A-2, and order dated -06-2024, Annexure A-3, as, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to settled legal position and in utter violation of principles of natural justice, null and void.

(B) Be pleased to allow this application with costs and be pleased to quantify the cost.”

2. The facts of the case in brief are as follows:-

2.1 The submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was appointed as an Insurance Medical Officer (IMO) Grade-II w.e.f. 11.02.2010 with reference to the advertisement for recruitment of Medical Officers in ESIC Hospitals in the State of Gujarat in PB-3 Rs.15600-39100/- with Grade pay of Rs.5400/-. Consequently, he was given the benefit of Dynamic Accrued Career Progression (DACP) in the GP of Rs. 6600/- as an Insurance Medical Officer Grade-1 and thereafter, he was promoted as Chief Medical Officer and granted Financial Upgradation at Level-12 w.e.f. 10.02.2019.

2.2 The counsel for the applicant further submitted that ESI Corporation issued a Transfer Policy dated 20.06.2022 for the Doctors of the ESI Corporation wherein para 4.2 of the said Transfer Policy provides for inviting online applications from the Doctors who have completed the tenure period of Medical Officer for more than 6 years at one station which could be extended for another three more years by the competent authority.

2.3 It is submitted that as per para 3 of the Transfer Policy, Medical Officers may give choices of medical institutions/stations as option for posting and, if, no such options are received from the eligible Medical Officers, such Medical Officer shall be considered for transfer/posting as per para 3.2 of the transfer policy. Accordingly, applicant had submitted choices of five places for posting through online. It is relevant to mention that Dr. Amee Amrutia, wife of the applicant is serving under Government of Gujarat as a Medical Officer CL-II, at Ayurveda Dispensary, Nava Naroda, Ahmedabad which entitles him for 10 points for special criteria as per the Priority Matrix of Transfer policy (Annexure-1).

2.4 It is contended that the applicant has received the transfer order dated 20.05.2023 from Bapunagar Model Hospital, ESIC, Gujarat to ESIC Hospital Indore. As per counsel for the applicant, it is contrary to the provisions of transfer policy of ESI Corporation. Subsequently, the applicant made representation dated 22.05.2023 to the Office of the respondent authorities against the impugned transfer order categorically referring clauses 7.4 and 7.10 of the policy and submitted that despite his spouse ground, he has been transferred while the medical officers who were seniors in terms of stay to him, posted in the station for longer period have been accommodated in the same station. (Annexure- A/7). The counsel for applicant further submits that during the pendency of the previous OA, the representation made to the Transfer Grievance Redressal Committee was disposed on 20.05.2023 (Annexure A/1) without considering the grounds made by the applicant in the said representation.

2.5 The counsel for applicant further submitted that in view of the f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top