Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, J
Radha Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Post, Telecommunication and IT, Department of Post, New Delhi. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for pensionary benefits after retirement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. reference to similar cases for equitable treatment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. legal framework of temporary status and implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. court's ruling on entitlement to benefits. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 5. directive for payment and interest on delays. (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Ashish Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that an identical issue has already been decided by this Tribunal in OA No. 522/2023 (Arun Kumar Tiwari vs. Union of India & Ors.), and he would be satisfied if a similar direction is issued in the present case.
3. The applicant has filed the present Original Application on 01.03.2024, Under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following main relief(s) which is stated in Para- 8 of the OA:-
“i. This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents togrant the applicantentire pensionary benefits including pension w.e.f.01.02.2024.
ii. This Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the respondents to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
