CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, J, Pragya Sahay Saksena, AM
Jyoti Gupta – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge on teacher transfer policies (Para 4 , 8) |
| 2. classification based on recruitment needs scrutiny (Para 21 , 22) |
| 3. impugned orders treated as arbitrary (Para 29 , 31) |
ORDER
Per:- Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member
The factual matrix and the controversy raised in all the above captioned Original Applications (in short OAs) and Transferred Applications (in short TAs) is identical and all the OAs/TAs are being disposed of by a common order.
2. The Original Application No. 161 of 2023 titled Jyoti Gupta Vs UT of J&K and others is treated as lead case.
3. The applicant in the instant petition filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has sought the following reliefs:-
“a. Impugned clause 3(a) of Government order No. 20-Edu of 2019 dated 22.01.2019 issued by respondent no. 1 may kindly be quashed being totally illegal and ultra-virus to the Constitution of India, J&K School Education (Subordinate) Service Recruitment Rules, 2008 and J&K Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956.
b. Impugned communication No. Edu-RET/1/2022-01 (CC NO. 114045) dated 25.07.2022 issued by respondent no. 1 may kindly be quashed being totally illega
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.