SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 16793

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, J, Pragya Sahay Saksena, AM
Jyoti Gupta – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Veenu Gupta, Mr. F A Natnoo, Mr. M R Qureshi, Mr. Ankur Sharma, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Amandeep, Mr. A A Khan, Mr. Sandeep Singh, Mr. Z A Mughal, Mr. F S Butt, Mr. Ajaz Choudhary, Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Mr. S R Bhat, Mr. Arshad Majid Malik, Mr. Sumit Moza, Mr. Anil Khajuria, Mr. Bhat Fayaz Ahmad, Mr. Dheeraj Singh Katoch, Mr. Syed Nadeem Hamdani, Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Mr. Ravi Abrol, Mr. Ashok Sharma, Mr. Navyug Sethi, Mr. Pawan K Kundal, Mr. Danish Butt, Mr. Sudershan Sharma, Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Mr. Ajit Verma, Mr. M I Sherkhan, Ms. Shivani Jalali, Mr. Vivek Sharma, Mr. Q T Nazir, Mr. Gagan Kohli, Mr. Abrar Ahmad Khan, Mr. Rizwan R Wani, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Mr. G S Thakur, Mr. Vikas Pankaj Sharma, Mr. Sudesh Sharma, Mr. Amit Khajuria, Mr. Ayushman Kotwal, Mr. Rohit Kohli, Mr. Gaurav Arora, Mr. F A Mir, Mr. S H Rather, Mr. S S Chandel, Mr. J S Jasrotia, Mr. T M Khan, Mr. M A Bhat, Mr. Sarfaraz Shah, Mr. Aftab Malik, Mr. R D S Bandral, Mr. Adeep Singh, Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Mr. A D Raina, Mr. Ajay Singh Kotwal. Mr. N D Qazi, Mr. Rajnesh Singh Parihar, Mr. Ashish Choudhary
For the Respondents: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, A.A.G

Table of Content
1. challenge on teacher transfer policies (Para 4 , 8)
2. classification based on recruitment needs scrutiny (Para 21 , 22)
3. impugned orders treated as arbitrary (Para 29 , 31)

ORDER

Per:- Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member

The factual matrix and the controversy raised in all the above captioned Original Applications (in short OAs) and Transferred Applications (in short TAs) is identical and all the OAs/TAs are being disposed of by a common order.

2. The Original Application No. 161 of 2023 titled Jyoti Gupta Vs UT of J&K and others is treated as lead case.

3. The applicant in the instant petition filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has sought the following reliefs:-

“a. Impugned clause 3(a) of Government order No. 20-Edu of 2019 dated 22.01.2019 issued by respondent no. 1 may kindly be quashed being totally illegal and ultra-virus to the Constitution of India, J&K School Education (Subordinate) Service Recruitment Rules, 2008 and J&K Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956.

b. Impugned communication No. Edu-RET/1/2022-01 (CC NO. 114045) dated 25.07.2022 issued by respondent no. 1 may kindly be quashed being totally illega

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top