Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pankaj Kumar, Administrative Member
Abhinandan Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's transfer challenged due to child's disability (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. transfer is essential condition of service (Para 4) |
| 3. dopt policies require sympathetic consideration for caregivers (Para 6) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Per Hon’ble Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Member-Administrative In this case relating to transfer, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:
“(1) To quash the impugned transfer order dated 04.04.2024 contained as Annexure No. A-1 to this OA) to the extent it relates to the applicant, with all consequential benefits.
1.A To quash the impugned order dated 01.05.2024 contained as Annexure No.A-1A to this OA, with all consequential benefits.
2. To allow the applicant to continue at Lucknow, with all consequential benefits.
3. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case, may also be passed.
4. Cost of the present case.”
2. The facts of the case are that the applicant, working on the post of Director (Geology) at Lucknow under the respondents, was transferred to Jammu vide order dated 04.04.2024 which also included transfer of 45 other officers. The applicant submitted representation dated 05.04.2024 to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
