Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Girja Shankar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts concerning the compassionate appointment request based on financial distress. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the compassionate appointment rejection. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court observations confirming adherence to guidelines regarding compassionate appointments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final ruling dismissing the application for compassionate appointment. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Ravi Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Chandra Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant Original Application, filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeks the following main reliefs:-
“(i) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to set aside/quash the impugned order dated 20.09.2021 issued by the Divisional Personnel Of icer, N.C. Railway, Agra Cantt (Respondent No. 5) denying appointment on compassionate ground to the applicant despite the facts that father of the applicant Late Radhey Lal, Helper Khalasi/S&T under the SSE/S&T/Mathura Jn. was declared completely medically incapacitated for further service in any post on Railway by the A.C.M.S., N.C.R., Mathura Jn. on 23
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
