SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 16924

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
DR. LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, JUDICIAL MEMBER, MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Jarupala Anju – Appellant
Versus
Chief Post Master General AP Circle – Respondent
ORIGINAL APPLICATIONS NO.021/00579/2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri P.V.Krishnaiah
For the Respondents: Smt. K.Rajitha, Sr.PC for CG

The applicant failed to secure employment due to miscategorization, emphasizing the need for accurate category declaration to access reservation benefits.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - The applicant sought relief regarding non-consideration for the Post Man/Mail Guard post against ST vacancies despite securing 77 marks while lower-scoring candidates were selected. He argued that the failure to consider his application under the ST category violated Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 13)

(B) Employment Notification - The applicant erroneously applied under the 'General' category instead of the 'ST' category, leading to his disqualification despite being an ST candidate. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correct categorization in applying for reservations. (Paras 3, 4, 11, 12, 14)

(C) Constitutional Rights - The decision reinforced that the privileges of ST candidates apply only if the application is correctly categorized according to community status. (Paras 4, 12)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, an ST candidate, applied for the Post Man/Mail Guard position listed for STs and General categories, mentioning his category as General in error. Despite getting higher marks than selected ST candidates, he was not appointed. He contended that his representation seeking reconsideration was neglected by the authorities. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal ruled that the applicant's error in categorization disqualified him from appointment, reaffirming the need for proper application categorization per job notifications. (Paras 11, 12)

Issues: The main issue pertained to whether the applicant could be considered for ST category despite applying for the General category and the implications of his scoring more than selected candidates. (Paras 2, 5, 6)

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that candidates must accurately declare their category to be eligible for the benefits associated with that category; hence, the applicant could not claim ST benefits after opting for the General category. (Paras 12, 14)

Result: The OA is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. application for post affected by incorrect categorization. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. legal obligations for employers regarding reservations if application is improperly categorized. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. court's stance on eligibility based on self-declared category. (Para 12 , 14)

ORDER

PER: HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking therein the following relief:

“To grant appropriate relief declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd Respondents not considering the case of the applicant for appointment to the post of Post Man/Mail Guard against the ST vacancies in pursuance of notification No.RE/1-22/PM & MG/DR/2013 & 2014, dtd. At Hyd-1 the 16.1.2015 issued by the 1st and 2nd Respondents while appointing candidates who got lesser marks than the Applicant, in considering the representation made by the applicant dt.06.05.2015 as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents to forthwith consider the case of the applicant for appointment to the post of Post Man/Mail Guard against the ST vacancies in pursuance of the notification No.E/1-22/PM & MG/DR/2013 & 2014, dtd. at Hyd-1 the 16.1.2015 issued by the 1st and 2nd Respondents in considering the representation made by the Applicant dt.06.05.2015 ignoring the Proceedings No.B2/PM/DR/Exam-2014 dtd. at Hyd.80 the 25.05.2015 issued by the 3rd Respondent with effect from the date of appointment of the ST candidates who got lesser marks than the applicant with all consequential benefits including seniority and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are as follows:

i. The applicant submits that he belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community and he is fully eligible and qualified for appointment to the post of Post Man/Mail Guard.

ii. The 1st & 2nd Respondents issued a notification for direct recruitment, vide notification No.RE/1-22/PM & MG/DR/2013 & 2014, dtd.16.01.2015. So far as the Secunderabad Division is concerned, 5 posts of Post Man/Mail Guard were notified for ST candidates, apart from 19 for OC and 12 for OBC, prescribing the minimum educational qualification for the said post as Matriculation/SSC from a recognized Board or University.

iii. The applicant applied for the aforesaid post of Post Man/Mail Guard online, with reference ID No.A310100A46B16. While filling up the online application, at Column No.3, i.e., ‘Category Applied For’, he had mentioned ‘General’ and at Column No.4, i.e., ‘Special Category Applied For’ he had mentioned ‘No’. At the 5th Column, pertaining to community, he had mentioned ‘ST’. As there is a separate column, i.e., Column No.5 exclusively with regard to the community, the applicant states that he felt that Column No.3 ‘Category Applied For’ does not pertain to the community/social status and, therefore, he did not mention that he had applied for the said post under the Scheduled Tribe category.

iv. The applicant also made the point that even though he belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community, which is already stated in the application, in the event of the applicant getting higher merit/rank/marks, on par with OC candidates, the applicant is also entitled to get appointment against the OC category post, notwithstanding the fact that he belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community. Because of these reasons and, more particularly, as there is no clarity in Column No.3, the applicant says, he had filled up ‘General’ in this column.

v. As the applicant belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community and since ST candidates are exempted from paying the examination fees, the applicant had paid Rs.100/- only towards application registration fees. He was issued hall ticket No.1046150535 with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top