CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Ranjit More, Chairman, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
D.S. Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
By way of the present OA filed u/s 19 of the AT Act, 1985, the applicant in para 8 of the OA has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(i) to quash and set aside the Order No. 1/21/DIV/2010- VSII/AV.I dated 28.10.2015 (A-1), Charge Sheet dated 14.12.2010 (A-2) and Inquiry Report dated 11.06.2014 (A-3).
(ii) to declare the action of respondents in initiating disciplinary proceedings and appointing I.O. & P.O. as illegal and accordingly quash and set aside the Charge Memo dated 14.12.2010 as well as subsequent orders and direct the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the applicant withheld on account of said proceedings/penalty order.
(iii) to pass other order as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Pursuant to notice, the respondents have filed their counter affidavit opposing the claim of the applicant and have prayed for dismissal of the present Original Application. The applicant has also filed his rejoinder denying the contention of the counter affidavit and reiterated his claim in the OA.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was subjected to disciplinary action vide Charge me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.