SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 17130

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Smt. Urmita Datta (Sen), J, Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, AM
Swapan Kumar Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Department of Posts – Respondent
O.A. 350/00577/2022



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. S. K. Datta
For the Respondent(s): Ms. J. D. Chakraborty

Seniors in postal service are entitled to financial upgradation under TBOP/BCR schemes retroactively to junior's upgrade date, despite previous misinterpretations of departmental guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Benefits of TBOP/BCR Schemes - Financial upgradation claims of seniors rejected based on prior decision for juniors - Supreme Court Order leading to reinstatement of benefits - Tribunal ordered to grant benefits to seniors effective from date juniors were upgraded. (Paras 6.5, 7)

(B) Employment law - Financial upgradation claims - Court highlights precedent on rights of employees with respect to promotional benefits - Respective provisions in departmental guidelines and rules were insufficient grounds for denying claims. (Paras 6.4, 6.3)

Facts of the case:
The applicants, having served in the Postal Department, sought financial upgradation under TBOP/BCR Schemes, which had been denied based on a perceived application issue. The applicants contended earlier conditional benefits that favored their juniors unfairly impacted their rights.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, highlighting a misinterpretation of rules regarding the seniority and eligibility under the TBOP/BCR provisions.

Issues: The main issues included the proper application of guidelines for financial upgrades and the circumstances under which employees are entitled to retroactive benefits based upon earlier decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal determined the misapplication of rules led to unjust denial of benefits and emphasized the continuity of entitlement for seniors based on junior upgrade dates.

Result: Financial upgradation ordered for the applicants from dates their junior was benefitted.

Table of Content
1. claims of seniors under tbop/bcr schemes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. rulings on entitlement based on senior-junior relationships in employment. (Para 5 , 6)
3. enforcement of financial upgrades ordered. (Para 7)

ORDER

Per: Hon’ble Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member

The applicants have approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 praying for the following relief:

“a. An order holding that the denial of benefits of TBOP/BCR Schemes and consequent stepping up of pay to the applicants at par with their erstwhile junior Sri Arunech Chandra Ghosh, Ex-PA, Howrah Head Post Office is unjustified and illegal.

b. An order quashing and/or setting aside the communication dated 26.07.2021.

c. An order holding that the applicants are entitled to the benefits of stepping up of pay by way of benefits under TBOP/BCR Schemes at par with their erstwhile junior Sri Arunesh Chandra Ghosh, Ex-PA, Howrah Head Office with all consequential benefits.

d. An order directing the respondents to grant the benefits of stepping up of pay to the applicants at par with their erstwhile junior Sri Arunesh Chandra Ghosh, Ex-PA, Howrah Head Office who got the higher pay than that of the applicants due to extension of benefits of TBOP/BCR prior to the applicants and further directing the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the applicants.

e. An order directing the respondents to produce/ cause production of all relevant records.

f. Any other order or further order/orders as to this Hon’ble Tribunal may seem fit and proper .”

2. For the sake of clarity, facts in the case are delineated and discussed hereinunder :-

Applicants or their father belonged to Clerical Cadre of Postal Department and became Postal Assistants (PA) in the Department of Posts.

It is the case of the applicants that they got the benefits of Time Bound One Promotion/ Biennial Cadre Review (TBOP/BCR) Schemes on completion of 16/26 years of service but their erstwhile junior Arunesh Chandra Ghosh, Ex-PA, Howrah Head Office got such benefits prior to the applicants and in view of the Directorate’s letters dated 10.03.2017 and 08.05.2017, the applicants became entitled to the benefits of stepping up of pay by way of TBOP/BCR benefits at par with their erstwhile junior Arunesh Chandra Ghosh for which the applicants have made representations but the claim of the applicants have been rejected by a communication dated 26.07.2021. Hence, this OA.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that earlier the Postal Department decided to extend the benefits of TBOP/BCR Schemes to the employees from the dates their juniors were granted such benefits due to completion of 16 years and 26 years of service irrespective of the fact whether the seniors completed the said requisite years of service but the said benefits were withdrawn in the year 2000 in view of a Department of Posts’ order dated 17.05.2000. Assailing the said decision of 2000, an Original Application was filed being OA no. 1148/2003 which was disposed of by order dated 16.08.2004 by directing the respondent to consider the prayer of the applicants and review the impugned order dated 20.09.2000 and the order dated 17.05.2000 upon which it is based in the light of the judgment of the H3.o1n’ble Supreme Court dated 09.10.2002.

3.1 Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that the said order of the Tribunal dated 16.08.2004 was challenged upto Hon’ble Supreme Court and the SLP being dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the said order was implemented. On similar issues several cases were filed before this Tribunal and decision in one of such cases being OA no. 877/2004 is annexed to the application. Thereafter many other cases were decided and finally in view of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 13.02.2017, the Department of Posts has withdrawn the instruction dated 17.05.2000 and earlier decisions to grant benefits of TBOP/BCR Schemes to the seniors were revived by a lette

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top