Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M. Swaminathan, J, Sangam Narain Srivastava, A
T.A. Tamilmani, G. Ramaraj, S. Gajendran, K. Radha Krishnan, T.S. Parthiban, A. Thulasirangan, V. Pugazhendi, K. Madhavachari, B. Thangamani, S.R. Ravechandiren, D. Gopalakrishan, S. Sivasubramanian, C. Padmanabhan, K. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applicants' claims for macp benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments supporting entitlement to upgraded pay. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial observations on relevant laws and previous rulings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. ratio decidendi establishing the basis for decisions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusive ruling granting the macp benefits. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)
This OA have been filed by the applicants seeking the following relief:
“To declare that the applicants are entitled to 3 MACP benefit in PB2 (Rs.9300 – 34800) with Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- and consequently set aside order No.707, dated 24.12.2015 and Order th No.25122, dated 08.02.2016, issued by the 4 rd respondent in so far as it grants 3 MACP benefit in PB2 with grade Pay of Rs.4200 and consequently rd direct the respondents to grant the applicants, 3rd MACP Benefit in PB2 (Rs.9300 – 34800) with Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- with effect from the respective due dates with all consequential benefits, including monetary benefits flowing therefrom and pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and proper”.
2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
