Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, J, Santosh Mehra, ACJ
Ashok Ramchandra Nawle – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought; party contentions; limitation (Para 1 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. rtp background and eligibility for regularization (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 18) |
| 3. procedural history and representations; past service (Para 10 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. precedent on rtp and equal pay; jurisprudence (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. core ratio: grant benefits; three-year monetary limit; follow precedent (Para 24) |
| 6. final order: oa allowed; no costs (Para 25) |
ORDER
Per: Justice M.G. Sewlikar, Member (J)
By this application, the applicants are seeking the relief of appointment of the applicants as Regular Postal Assistants / Sorting Assistants from their respective dates the applicants have started working as Reserved Trained Pool staff and direction to the respondents for granting them the benefits like seniority, pay fixation, financial upgradations and pension fixations.
2. Facts leading to this application are that applicant nos. 1, 2, 5, 10, 12, 14, 17, 18 and 19 are working as Postal Assistants / Sorting Assistants in different units under administrative control and jurisdiction of the respondents. Applicant nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21 & 22 have alrea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
