Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.G. Sewlikar, J, Shri Krishna, ACJ
Santosh Motiram Chavan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introductory framing of the case and challenge (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background and procedural history of disciplinary actions (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. parties' contentions and responses on jurisdiction and process (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's analysis and reliance on authorities and statutory rules (Para 17 , 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. core legal principle (ratio): second charge permissible; revision authority validity (Para 27) |
| 6. outcome: original application dismissed; no costs (Para 30) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (A)
The challenge in this application is to the Order dated 16th February, 2022 passed by respondent no. 2 (Revisional Authority), Order dated 29th July, 2022 passed by the Appellate Authority (respondent no. 3), charge memorandum dated 05th January, 2022 and the Order dated 10th March, 2022 passed by the respondent no. 4 nominating the Enquiry Officer.
2. Facts in brief are that the applicant was appointed as Constable in Railway Protection Force (R.P.F) under Senior Divisional Security Commissioner, Bilaspur Division of South Eastern Railway on 22nd July, 2006.
3. The applicant was me
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
