Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajnish Kumar Rai, J
BALWANT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges rejection for compassionate appointment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents assert validity of prior rejection based on adoption issues. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observes need for proper evidence in compassionate appointment cases. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. decision upheld based on established principles against faulty documents. (Para 12 , 13) |
Order
The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and grant him compassionate appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules. The applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records, pursuant to which the letter impugned dated 23-01-2010 (Annexure No.A-1) has been passed by the Respondent No.3 and quash the same.
B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to consider and appoint the Applicant on any suitable post on Compassionate Grounds, duly treating the Adoption-Deed dated 31-07-2000 as just and proper.
C. Issue any other and further writ, order or directions; which this Hon'ble court may d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
