Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K. HARIPAL, J, V. RAMA MATHEW, A
Satyanarayan Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of removal from service due to alleged unauthorized absence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the procedural fairness and consideration of mental health. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial observations on the disciplinary process and its legality. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's analysis of the applicant’s mental state during proceedings. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion directing reinstatement of the applicant. (Para 28) |
ORDER
Justice K.Haripal
Applicant is a native of Rajasthan. He commenced service in the Mechanical Department of Southern Railway, Palakkad Division on 23.05.2006 as Mechanic. Later, on being medically decategorised, he was declared unfit for Bee-One and Bee-Two posts and fit for Cee-One and below only, which does not involve safety. Thus he was charged against a supernumerary post from the date of medical decategorisation and was maintained as Technician Grade II (Signal). Then he was given alternate appointment as Office Clerk under the Senior Section Engineer/Carrier and Wagon with effect from 26.09.2012.
2. While so, it is the common case that he had applied for 10 days' leave on average pay and proceeded to the native place. He had to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
