Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and prior tribunal orders for regularization. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' compliance claims and dop&t restrictions on macp. (Para 3) |
| 3. rejoinder arguments and review of pleadings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. enforcement of prior tribunal directive for backdated regularization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. limits on temporary service for macp versus pension benefits. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. directions for regularization, upgradations, and pension refixation. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
The grievance of the applicant in the present O.A. is that the respondents have not considered his request for fixation of retirement benefits after counting correct years of regular service and also not granted two financial upgradations after counting 50% temporary status service as per the undertaking given before the Tribunal in O.A. No.337/2012.
2. Briefly stated, the applicant was initially appointed as Khallasi on casual basis w.e.f. 11.11.1977 and, thereafter, he was disengaged on completion of work. He was re-engaged on 20.08.1981 and further disengaged on 01.10.1983. Challenging the same, the applicant filed O.A. No. 2242/1990 which was allowed by thi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
