SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 17817

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash Panchal – Appellant
Versus
M/o Railways – Respondent
O.A./1503/2024



Open Court CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD.

th Allahabad this, the 19 day of DECEMBER, 2024 Original Application No. 1503 of 2024 Hon’ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)

Om Prakash Panchal aged about 63 years S/O Bhagwan Das R/O 1027/1 Khati Baba Isai Tola Jhansi District Jhansi ..... . .Applicant By Advocate : Shri K.C. Vishwakarma Shri Ankur Vishwakarma V E R S U S

1. Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Railway.

New Delhi.

2. General Manager N.C. Railway Subedarganj, Prayagraj 3. Chief Work Manager, N.C. Railway (Work Shop) Jhansi

4. Senior Personnel Officer N.C. Railway (Work Shop) Jhansi

5. Assistant Personnel Officer North Central Railway (Work Shop) Jhansi.

.... . .Respondents By Advocate: Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan O R D E R By Hon’ble Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (A)

Shri K. C. Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2. The instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to fix the pension with one Additional th Notional Increment, alongwith all consequential benefits w.e.f. 30 June of the year in which he retired from government service. In this regard, the applicant has submitted his representation on 25.07.2024 to the respondent no.4/competent authority, i.e.

Senior Personnel Officer, N.C. Railway, (Workshop), Jhansi.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that his grievance may be redressed if a direction is given to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation dated 25.07.2024 (Annexure-11) of the applicant by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time bound manner.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection if such direction is issued to decide the representation of the applicant as per rules.

5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this original application pending. Accordingly, the competent authority amongst the respondents is directed to decide the said representation dated 25.07.2024 (Annexure-11) of the applicant in the light of existing rules and regulations within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

The order so passed shall be communicated to the applicant without any delay.

6. With the above direction, the original application no.1503 of

2024 is disposed of. No order as to costs.

7. It is made clear that I have not entered into the delay, latches and merit of the claim of the applicant. All points are open for consideration by the respondents.

8. Pending M.A., if any stands dispose of.

(Anjani Nandan Sharan) Member (Administrative)

/Neelam/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top