Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Sangam Narain Srivastava, A, Mr. M. Swaminathan, J
K. Jeyachandran – Appellant
Versus
Chairman and Managing Director, BSNL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek regularization based on earlier court success. (Para 3) |
| 2. respondents claim absence of necessary documents challenges applicants' positions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observes critical vacancy issues affecting entitlement. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 4. court concludes all oas dismissed due to late filing and lack of merit. (Para 11) |
| 5. only valid claims backed by evidence of vacancy can be considered. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Sangam Narain Srivastava, Member(A))
The applicants have filed these OAs under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following relief:
(i)To call for the records of the 2nd Respondent in “ connection with the letter No. BSNL/39-3/SR/2017 dated 24.07.2018 by AGM (SR) BSNL and set aside the decision conveyed under ltem 2 of the Minutes of 36th meeting of the National Council held on 12th June, 2018, rejecting the request of the applicants for extending the benefit of regularization of their casual service, granted in Annexure A7 order of the Ernakulam Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal;
ii) To declare that all the applicants are entitled for regularisation of their casual service till the date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
